Net neytrallik nima?

Men katta biznesning muxlisiman va qiyomatning nazariyotchisi emasman; ammo, aniq betaraflik shaxsan men uchun juda katta. Mening butun hayotim va farzandlarimni boqish qobiliyatim mening ishimning Internetdan foydalanish qobiliyatiga, Internetdan foydalanish qobiliyatimga bog'liq ... va bu tezda mening farzandlarimga aylanadi. Tez va sekin yo'llar bilan Internetni kesib tashlash tanlovni ta'minlamaydi, shunchaki sekin yo'llarni ko'mib tashlaydi. Bu shuni anglatadiki, bizning bloggerlar va kichik biznes tadbirkorlari kabi qobiliyatimiz yo'qoladi.

Menimcha, bu kam iqtisodiy o'sishga olib keladi va oxir-oqibat iqtisodiyotimizga va o'z navbatida soliq tushumiga zarar etkazadi. Bu juda qo'rqinchli stsenariy va Internet kichik ovozga keltiradigan boylik va kuch muvozanatini o'zgartiradi va uni pulli kishilarning qo'liga qaytaradi - xuddi gazeta, musiqa, radio va televizorda bo'lgani kabi.

Siz haqiqatan ham buzilmagan narsalarni emas, balki biz yashayotgan dunyoni o'zgartiradigan va kunning har soniyasida yangi iqtisodiyotlar va korxonalarni ochadigan narsalarni tuzatishda ishlamasligingiz kerak.

Bu erda ham ba'zi kinoya mavjud. Kabi korxonalar Akamai allaqachon korxonalarga o'zlarining kontentlarini etkazib berishni "tezlashtirishda" yordam berishadi:

Akamai EdgePlatform Internetni doimiy ravishda kuzatib boradigan 20,000 mamlakatda joylashgan 71 ta serverni o'z ichiga oladi? tirbandlik, muammoli joylar va umumiy sharoitlar. Biz ushbu ma'lumotdan marshrutlarni oqilona optimallashtirish va tezroq va ishonchli etkazib berish uchun tarkibni takrorlash uchun foydalanamiz. Bugungi kunda Akamai umumiy Internet-trafikning 20 foizini boshqarayotgani sababli, bizning Internetga bo'lgan qarashimiz har qanday joyda to'plangan eng keng qamrovli va dinamik hisoblanadi.

Yaqinda biz Akamai-ni o'z ishimizda ishlatishni boshladik va bu butun dunyo bo'ylab bizning ilovamizning javobini ikki raqamli takomillashtirish bo'ldi ... ba'zi joylarda 80% gacha. Bu, albatta, kichik biznes uchun qulay bo'lmagan texnologiya; ammo, bu o'z-o'zidan biznes. Shunday qilib, biz nafaqat ushbu yangi "tezkor chiziqlar" ga muhtoj emasmiz, balki bizda katta biznesga tezroq tarkibni etkazib berishda yordam beradigan echimlar mavjud. Xo'sh, nega biz hali ham bu haqda gaplashamiz?

Murojaatni imzolang va xayriya qiling Internetni saqlang.

6 Comments

  1. 1
  2. 2

    The folks that own the main thoroughfares of the Internet would like to create two paths for traffic. One path (as it is now) would be a normal internet routing. Another path; however, could be a path where the telecoms could charge for faster, better bandwidth for paying customers.

    The idea behind it is that legitimate businesses could pay for improved delivery of their content to you or me. This way they don’t have to worry about getting traffic through existing traffic. If you hit Google for instance, and they are paying for the increased bandwidth, their website would be able to load much faster.

    On paper, it sounds great. However, the result would most likely be catastrophic. There would be no incentive for these companies to improve the overall performance and infrastructure of the Internet for you and me. In fact, quite the opposite would be true. If they let the ‘normal’ pathways of the Internet drop in performance, it would attract more business for the ‘business’ pathways.

    Currently, if Verizon or AT&T or Comcast improves their network and bandwidth, har bir kishi sees the improvement. That’s the ‘neutral’ in Net Neutrality. Folks like me would like to keep it that way. If these guys build a faster, better network that you have to pay into, you and I will be out of business. People won’t bother coming to our sites because it will simply be too slow.

    At the root of my concern is that, although, these companies are investing heavily in the Internet – they did not create it. It was U.S. taxpayer money that got the Internet off the ground… we shouldn’t be left behind!

  3. 3

    Is this specific to the US or something all over. But, I guess since most of us non-US citizens have sites hosted in the US, it effects us a great deal.

    Going to blog about it. Thanks 🙂

    • 4

      It could happen anywhere, but if it happens in the U.S., the effects would definitely ripple well beyond. Other countries’ big businesses would most likely climb on the bandwagon as well, since that would be the infrastructure that would support reaching the most people. L’il ol’ folks like you and me would be forced to fork up some money or get left in the dirt.

  4. 5
  5. 6

Siz nima deb o'ylaysiz?

Ushbu sayt spamni kamaytirish uchun Akismet-dan foydalanadi. Fikringiz ma'lumotlarining qanday ishlashini bilib oling.